Alternate Strategies for Stretch IRA

Author

Personal Living Alert

For more information about the author, click to view their website: Personal Living Alert

Posted on

Aug 09, 2023

Book/Edition

Florida - Southwest

share-this
Share This

Over the years, we lauded the stretch IRA as one of our favorite tax-saving moves, to help mitigate the tax bill when non spouse heirs inherit retirement accounts and build wealth for another generation. But all good things come to an end—starting this year, non spouse heirs who inherit IRAs are out of luck when it comes to using the stretch. The

SECURE Act, signed into law in late 2019, mandates that many non spouse heirs who receive inherited retirement accounts must empty the accounts within a decade.


The stretch strategy, which gave non spouse heirs the opportunity to take out inherited IRA distributions over their own life expectancies, was targeted by Congress as a loophole used by the wealthy. In reality, the strategy was also used by those people who just diligently saved in retirement accounts for years and wanted to pass on as much of the legacy as possible to their progeny.


Albeit not a perfect strategy, spreading out the tax bill through the stretched distributions kept heirs’ tax tabs in check and allowed more of the money to grow for a longer time. The younger the beneficiary, the more advantageous the stretch could be.


After wiping away the tears over the stretch IRA’s demise, it’s time to get down to b


rass tacks and search for alternative options to the stretch. Don’t assume your only option is to accept Uncle Sam’s forced accelerated payout schedule. There are still moves that IRA owners can make to help ease the transfer of their legacy to their chosen beneficiaries and save some money from the taxman.


None of the alternatives are quite as cheap—read “free”—as the stretch strategy was, but we’ll start with the cheaper options and move into some that will require more thought and expense. As the new rules get fully digested, more alternate strategies could crop up. But the alternate strategies we look at here offer attractive opportunities to make the most of inherited IRAs under the new rules.


One critical point: Anyone who inherited an IRA before 2020 can stop reading. They need not worry about the new rules as nothing changes for them.


Pre-2020 non spouse heirs can keep using the stretch strategy as it previously existed


, and they can keep taking required minimum distributions based on their life expectancies from inherited IRAs.


But people who inherit IRAs starting in 2020 and beyond are subject to the new rules. And the new rules can shrink the legacy left to your heirs, as the online calculator at securermd.comillustrates. Let’s say a 55-year-old heir receives a $1 million inherited traditional IRA, the money grows 6% a year, and the heir takes distributions every year for 10 years. (You can use the calculator to plug in your own numbers to compare


.)


Under the old stretch rules, in year 10, the non spouse heir would take an RMD of about $57,000 and would have nearly $1.2 million left in the inherited IRA; he would have taken out about $445,000 in RMDs over the decade.


Under the new accelerated payout rules, in year 10, the heir zeroes out the inherited IRA as required with his last distribution of nearly $169,000 and would have taken more than $1.3 million in RMDs.


The heir who got to use the old stretch rules has about $331,000 more in total in year 10 with the combination of the total RMDs taken and the amount still left in the inherited IRA. The heir using the new rules not only has less money in total, but tops that off with a whopping $855,000 more in taxable RMD income by the end of the decade.




Clearly, there’s a cost for non spouse IRA heirs who have lost the stretch. If you want more of your IRA to go to your heirs instead of Uncle Sam, here are some of the best alternative tax-advantaged strategies available now to IRA owners who are adjusting their estate plans for their families.


Carefully Mull Beneficiaries


As the SECURE Act swept away the stretch for many non spouse heirs, the new law also created a new type of beneficiary: the eligible designated beneficiary. These b


eneficiaries “can still use the stretch rules as they previously existed,” says Lisa Featherngill, a certified public accountant and member of the American Institute of CPAs Personal Financial Planning Executive Committee.


If a named heir is a minor, disabled, chronically ill or not more than 10 years younger than the deceased owner, the heir qualifies as an eligible designated beneficiary. For instance, if the IRA owner has named a sibling two years younger as a beneficiary, that sibling could use the old stretch rules if she inherits the IRA, says Nancy Anderson, senior vice president and the head of wealth strategy and trust services at Calamos Wealth Management.


Note that only minors who are children of the deceased IRA owner fall in this EBD group, and once the minor reaches age of majority (18 or 21, depending on the state),


the 10-year rule kicks in. Minor grandkids, once a popular choice to be named as IRA beneficiaries because of their long life expectancies, are immediately stuck with the new 10-year payout rule.


Also in this category: surviving spouses. They also aren’t subject to the new rules; but unlike any other beneficiaries, surviving spouses can take an inherited IRA as their own. That flexibility for widows and widowers hasn’t changed under the new law.


As you consider who should get your IRA, “look at those beneficiaries and see who might have an exception to the rules,” says Christine Russell, senior manager of retirement and annuities at TD Ameritrade. If you have potential heirs who fall into this new category of eligible designated beneficiaries, you might consider naming one of them as a beneficiary of your IRA since they can make use of the old stretch rules.



When mulling beneficiaries, you might also consider the tax situation of your heirs. Say you have two children, one who has a high-paying job and the other who is barely scraping by. You might want to leave a taxable traditional IRA to the one in the lower income-tax bracket, while leaving a Roth IRA or highly appreciated stock to the child in the higher tax bracket.


Bequeath Other Assets


While under the old rules you might have wanted to preserve your IRA to pass on to your heirs to do the stretch, it could be worth rethinking such a plan. If you are in a lower tax bracket than your non spouse heirs, you might want to spend down your IRA and preserve other assets for your beneficiaries, such as highly appreciated stock or real estate, or Roth accounts.


Heirs who inherit capital assets, such as stock and real estate, that have appreciated will get a step up in basis to the assets’ value on the date of your death. Only appreciation after that date will be taxed if and when the heirs sell the asset. The higher basis would


reduce the heirs’ tax hit.


Heirs to Roth IRAs still have to empty the accounts out within 10 years under the new rules, but the money distributed out of Roths is tax-free to heirs. “For heirs, it’s better to get a Roth,” says Anderson.


Do Roth Conversions


Speaking of Roths, one of the top strategies to consider is converting a traditional IRA to a Roth, says Jamie Hopkins, director of retirement research at the Carson Group. Heirs cannot do this conversion when they receive an inherited IRA; you must do the Roth conversion yourself while you’re still alive and kicking. You essentially prepay the tax bill for


your heirs, giving them the gift of a tax-free pot of assets.


Most taxpayers likely want to convert an IRA to a Roth over time in smaller chunks to keep the tax bill they pay in check. Anytime you do a Roth conversion, you create taxable income that gets added to the rest of your taxable income for the year. Do too big of a Roth conversion and you could spike yourself into too high of a tax bracket unnecessarily. But as Hopkins notes, “tax rates are historically low,” which makes doing Roth conversions more attractive. Current income-tax rates are scheduled to last until 2026.


Also, compare your tax rate with the rates of your heirs. If your rate is lower than their rates, or you think your current rate will be lower than their future rates, then it can m


ake sense to convert more now. If your heirs are in a lower tax bracket, then you might want to convert less.


Any amount you convert from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA starts growing tax-free from the moment it goes into the Roth. So the sooner you get money into a Roth, the longer it will have to grow.


Maximize the New 10-Year Rule


A key point: The new 10-year withdrawal rule does not require that heirs take minimum distributions each of those years, but instead it only requires that all money be out of the account by the end of the tenth year following the year the IRA owner dies. That fact makes inheriting a Roth even more compelling.



Heirs who inherit a Roth IRA could leave the money alone for nearly 11 years to grow tax free. And in the last year, they can take out the entire lump sum with no tax consequence. A pretty sweet deal.


On the flip side, even though it’s not required, heirs who inherit a traditional IRA might want to take out some of the money each year to spread the tax bill, which might also spare some of the dollars from Uncle Sam. If an heir inherits a $500,000 traditional IRA, he could take $50,000 each year over the decade, rather than taking out the whole $500,000 in the last year. Spreading the distributions could result in a smaller total tax bill. How much smaller will depend on how much taxable income the heir has of his own in each of those years. The taxable windfall could subject the rest of the heir’s taxable income to a higher tax rate.




Heirs will have to look at their own tax situation when deciding how to take the money out in that decade. If the heir expects less taxable income of his own in a couple of those years—say, he’s going back to school to change careers—then those years might be a good time to take out more from the inherited IRA. If the heir expects more taxable income in a particular year, perhaps a big work bonus, that might be a year to skip taking money from the inherited IRA. “Heirs will need to do multiple years of tax planning and do some tax bracket management,” says Featherngill.


Reorganize Who’s Primary


Another way couples can maximize the 10-year rule: Consider naming other heirs as primary beneficiaries along with your spouse. “The answer in the past would be to roll [the IRA] to the spouse,” says Hopkins. But now, he notes, that won’t always be the clear choice.

Let’s say you planned to leave your IRA to your wife as the primary beneficiary and to your three kids as contingent beneficiaries. At your death, your surviving wife would get your IRA, avoiding the 10-year rule, and she takes your IRA as her own. The three kids eventually inherit her IRA money, which includes yours, and they each have 10 years to distribute their shares.


Instead, you might consider naming your wife and your three kids as primary beneficiaries. Assuming you split the IRA evenly, your surviving wife would get one-fourth to take as her own, while each of the three kids would get 10 years to distribute their shares of your IRA. When your wife passes away and leaves her IRA to the three kids, each of the three kids gets another 10 years to take that money. The kids could potentially get up to 20 years to take IRA money that was initially yours. “A solid strategy now is to have multiple primary beneficiaries,” says Russell.


Give IRA Money to Charity


If you are charitably inclined, the new 10-year payout requirement could make it more attractive for you to leave a traditional IRA to charity, says Featherngill. You can name charities as beneficiaries of your IRA, and the charity won’t pay tax on any of the traditional IRA money it receives.


You might also want to do charitable giving from an IRA now and leave more money in other assets to heirs, says Keith Bernhardt, vice president of retirement income for Fidelity Investments. The qualified charitable distribution might be more appealing—this move lets IRA owners age 70½ and older give up to $100,000 to charity directly from their IRAs each year. The money won’t show up in your adjusted gross income, and once you’re subject to RMDs at age 72, the QCD can count toward the RMD, too. The QCDs will lower your traditional IRA balance, which means heirs would receive less taxable income.


Create a Charitable Remainder Trust


This is another option for the charitably inclined, which can simulate the stretch IRA, says Brian Ellenbecker, senior financial planner at financial-services firm Baird. With a charitable remainder trust, you put assets in the trust and provide income for beneficiaries for a set term or for life. At the trust’s end, the remainder of the principal goes to charity.

You can use the trust to provide a stream of income to beneficiaries much like the stretch IRA was able to do. And for the charitably inclined, this trust meets the goal of transferring money to a good cause, too.


Anytime a trust is involved, though, there will be costs, including setup costs, fees to hire an estate-planning lawyer and possibly ongoing maintenance costs. And don’t forget to have old trusts looked at in light of the new law: Have a professional review any existing trusts you have that incorporate the stretch strategy, which may need language changes to accommodate the new law. “Most have to be revised or redone,” says Ellenbecker.

An old trust that uses language referring to RMDs could create unintended consequences, because now heirs aren’t required to take money out annually—only by the end of the 10th year. “It’s a one-year distribution,” says Hopkins. An old trust with RMD language could trigger an entire taxable payout—a disaster in terms of estate planning.


Use Life Insurance


Another possible, though also costly, option: life insurance. You could use distributions from your IRA, such as RMDs, to pay for premiums for a life insurance policy. At your death, the policy would provide income-tax-free death proceeds to your beneficiaries. Your IRA that passes to your heirs would also have a lower balance, as the money shifted to pay insurance premiums.


You could also reduce your gross estate by setting up an irrevocable life insurance trust to hold the policy. The trust would have costs of its own, but if you are worried about estate taxes, an ILIT removes the policy from your estate.


Life insurance can be an effective way to transfer wealth, but it comes at the cost of the insurance premiums—which can be more expensive if you implement this strategy later in life. “That premium wouldn’t be cheap, and you would need to be insurable,” says Michael Roberts, president of Arden Trust Co.


You must be healthy enough to be underwritten for a life insurance policy—and to get a better deal on the premiums. If premiums are too expensive, this option might not make sense.


If the life insurance strategy does work for you, you could pair it with the charitable remainder trust strategy. You could buy enough life insurance to provide a similar amount of proceeds to go to your heirs as the amount that will go to the charity at the end of the charitable remainder trust.


Any one of these alternate strategies might work for your family, or perhaps a combination of them. Although Uncle Sam surely won’t mind taking a bigger cut of your IRA assets, these strategies can help preserve more of your legacy to pass on to the next generation of your family. And from many Kiplinger’s Retirement Report readers I’ve heard from regarding this change in IRA rules, that is a top priority.

Other Articles You May Like

Is buying a home always the right move?

Its widely thought that home ownership is a key to building wealth but is it? And should you consistently make sacrifices to buy your own home?            Lets start with the first question: Is owning a home essential to building wealth? It would probably be more accurate to say that home ownership can be helpful in building wealth. Building home equity essentially, the difference between the size of your homes value and what you still owe is certainly valuable. Plus, the bigger your equity, the less you might have to take out in a new mortgage if you ever want to buy a different home.            Now for the next question: How much should you sacrifice to buy your own home? This isnt an easy question to answer because buying a home isnt just a financial issue its also an emotional one. Many people simply like the feeling of owning a home. If you fall into this category, you might be willing to make many sacrifices to join the ranks of homeowners.            However, if youre relatively young and you are part of a single or even a dual-income household, you may well find that your other priorities are more important than home ownership, at least for the moment. These priorities can include paying off student loans, reducing other debts, paying for child care, meeting health care costs and even saving for retirement. With all these expenses, you might not be able to take on a big mortgage, along with real estate taxes, homeowners insurance and the inevitable but costly repairs that come with owning a home.            In addition to the danger of becoming house poor by paying too high a percentage of your income on your mortgage, you could face another issue by sinking too much money into your home and thats liquidity. A home is much more illiquid than savings or investment accounts, so if you needed money in a hurry, and most of yours was tied up in your home, you might be in a jam. You could tap into your home equity through a loan or a line of credit, but thats basically taking on even more debt, though these loans and credit lines typically offer lower interest rates than other forms of borrowing.             So, heres the bottom line: You dont need to feel that you are missing out on a chance to build wealth by not buying a home immediately especially if you would feel extremely stretched by the mortgage payments, given how expensive homes are today. You wont hurt yourself and, in fact, youll likely help yourself by taking care of your most pressing priorities first.             Of course, this doesnt mean that you can never become a homeowner. If you would still like to own a home someday, you could start saving for a down payment, keeping the money in a liquid, low-risk account. Just as importantly, though, you should plan on how owning a home can fit into your budget and how it will affect your cash flow. If you can manage it, you may indeed find that theres no place like home.Chad Choate III, AAMS 828 3rd Avenue West Bradenton, FL 34205 941-462-2445 chad.chaote@edwardjones.com This article was written by Edward Jones for use by your local Edward Jones Financial Advisor. Edward Jones-Member SIPC

How to Pay for Senior Living

Considering senior living as the best option for you or a loved one? If youre just beginning, the search can often feel daunting. And knowing where to look for possible financial resources can seem like a mystery.Its often helpful to approach this as a step-by-step process. Answering the following questions can help get you off to the right start: What lifestyle, amenities and services are you looking for? Is help needed for physical or cognitive issues? If yes, at what level? Which of the 4 basic types of senior living listed below would provide the best fit? What is the cost of senior living? What options may be available to pay for senior living? Basic categories of senior livingFollowing are 4 types of communities available: Independent Living: Private residences for older adults to continue living independently and enjoy the activities, amenities and services offered. Assisted Living: Private residences and assistance with the activities of daily living, such as bathing and dressing. Amenities and other social activities included. Long-Term or Skilled Nursing Care: Full-time care by a trained staff for those requiring medical care for rehabilitation or for long-term chronic conditions. Memory Care: Specialized care for those with Alzheimers or dementia, included as part of assisted living, long-term care or in a stand-alone community. The cost of senior livingPrices vary among communities, services offered and locations. Talk to an associate at a specific community to confirm costs. Be sure to clarify what services are included or can be contracted for an additional fee.How to pay for senior livingEach type of senior living may have varying costs and different payment sources available.When you visit a community, theyll provide you with more detailed information about financial options. We also invite you to download our free guide The Dollars and Sense Guide to Senior Living.The following list offers an overview of a few of the financial resources that may be available, as well as options you might not have yet considered. Private money Personal funds are typically used to pay for independent living, the majority of assisted living and a smaller amount of long-term care. Some states do accept Medicaid for certain assisted living costs.Personal resources could include: Cash Checking and savings accounts Salaries, if youre still working Social Security payments Dividends distributed Investment accounts Retirement or pension plans Long-Term Care Insurance Depending on the policy, long-term insurance may cover the cost of home care, adult day care, assisted living, memory care and long-term care. These policies are sold by private insurance companies and other businesses or as additional insurance offered by employers.The cost of a policy is based on the age of the person at the time of purchase, amount of insurance, time period covered, deductible and any special options. Veterans Benefits Veterans or their surviving spouses may be eligible to receive monthly benefits to help cover the costs of senior living if they meet certain income and personal care qualifications. Known as Aid and Attendance, this federal benefit is offered through The Department of Veteran Affairs. It can help pay for care in the home, assisted living or a long-term care community. Life insurance conversions Your life insurance policy may be transferred to a financial account that provides monthly benefits to help pay for home care, assisted living, long-term care and hospice. These funds wont count as an asset in the Medicaid spend down process, described below. Your home Seniors may have equity built up in their home, which can provide a source of funds. If youre moving into a senior living community, selling your home may provide the money you need.Other financial options that your home may offer include: Access to cash through a home equity loan A line of credit based on your homes equity Reverse mortgage which also considers a homes equity. This funding is only available if one of the owners remains living in the home. Renting out your home. If your home is paid for, the rent received could be applied toward senior living expenses. Medicare Medicare is a federal health insurance program and will only pay for long-term care if you require rehabilitative care at home or in a nursing home, for a limited period of time and if you meet certain restrictions. It doesnt pay for general personal care, assistance with the activities of daily living, or room and board. Medicaid Medicaid will pay for long-term nursing facility care but in order to be eligible, you need to qualify for having limited financial resources. If you do have assets, however, you would need to spend them down in order to qualify. As a joint federal and state program, states may offer some assistance with assisted living costs.Considerations when calculating the cost of senior livingPeople often assume its less expensive to remain at home instead of moving to a community. But that may not be true. Look at the big picture when considering the costs of home vs senior living. If your home would need expensive renovations to make it accessible or if you would need to contract for services to come into your home, the costs may be more comparable than you might have thought.But dont forget to account for the non-financial benefits and advantages. If the safety and quality of life for you or your loved one can be achieved more successfully in a senior living community, youll want to consider the tradeoff of any monetary savings.

Will My Disability Benefits Change When I Turn 65?

Will My Disability Benefits Change When I Turn 65?Turning 65 years old has traditionally been associated with retirement and enrollment in federal benefit programs. However, people with disabilities may already be receiving federal benefits through Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare before they turn 65.Disabled individuals who qualify for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and/or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) may wonder what happens to their disability benefits when they reach retirement age.The short answer is that their benefits dont end, and the amount they received prior to turning 65 remains the same. But given the complexity of the federal benefits system, there may be exceptions to these general rules on a case-by-case basis that need to be discussed with a disability attorney.Age 65 and Full Retirement AgeFor most of Social Securitys history, full retirement age, or the age at which someone could receive the maximum amount of Social Security retirement benefits based on their work history, was 65 years old.Reforms to Social Security in the 1980s raised the full-benefit retirement age to between 66 and 67 years old, depending on when somebody was born. For anybody born in 1960 and later, full retirement age is now 67.When Does Social Security Disability Convert to Regular Social Security?The Social Security Administration (SSA) does not permit a person to receive both disability and retirement benefits on one earnings record at the same time.For anyone receiving SSDI payments, their monthly disability benefit automatically switches to Social Security retirement upon reaching full retirement age. Again, this is age 66 or 67 for most people.When this switch takes place, the monthly payment amount stays the same.How Long Do Social Security Disability Benefits Last?SSDI lasts for as long as the recipient has a disabling condition and is unable to work, or until they reach retirement age, at which time the disability benefit converts to a retirement benefit.Social Security performs a continuing disability review (CDR) of SSDI recipients every three to seven years.Turning 65 or reaching full retirement age does not trigger this review. And once SSDI benefits change over to retirement benefits, there is no need for a medical review, since a recipient doesnt have to be disabled to receive Social Security old age benefits.SSI and Retirement AgeA person may qualify for SSI with a disability if they have little or no income and resources and are age 64 and younger, or they have little or no income or resources and are age 65 and older.Qualifying for SSI does not require a work history the way that SSDI does. So, someone can qualify for SSI without ever having worked. But because the SSI benefit payment is not tied to a work history, SSI benefits do not convert to retirement benefits upon reaching full retirement age.If someones receiving SSI for a disability, their benefits can continue after they reach retirement age as long as they still meet the programs financial requirements.Disabled SSI recipients are subject to a CDR at least once every three years, or every five to seven years. During the CDR, the SSA also reviews a recipients income and resources to ensure they are still eligible for and receiving the correct SSI benefit amount.Disability, Medicare, and Turning 65Medicare eligibility ordinarily begins at age 65. But people under age 65 whove gotten SSDI benefits for at least 24 months can start receiving Medicare.SSDI recipients automatically get Medicaid Part A and Part B, collectively known as Original Medicare, after receiving their 25th month of benefits. They can choose at that time to decline or keep Part B, which covers services from doctors and other health care providers. They must typically keep Part A, the portion covering inpatient hospital care.When individuals with qualifying disabilities turn 65 and gain age-based Medicare eligibility, they dont have to re-enroll or complete additional paperwork to continue receiving health care benefits.Turning 65, though, amounts to a secondary initial enrollment period. This could be a good time to re-evaluate current Medicare coverages and make changes.For example, a disabled Medicare recipient may have declined Part B coverage when they first enrolled but decide to keep this coverage when they enroll again at age 65. They can also choose to enroll in another Medicare program, such as Part C or D.Disability, Medicaid, and Turning 65Medicaid is government health care for people with limited income, including those with disabilities.In many states, SSI recipients automatically qualify for Medicaid. Medicaid eligibility thats based on receiving SSI should not be impacted by turning 65, but there could be considerations related to special needs trust funding at age 65.Medicaid covers some costs that Medicare does not, such as long-term care. Special needs trusts can help to preserve a beneficiarys access to benefits like SSI and Medicaid. But the window of time to fund a first-party special needs trust closes at age 65.Some people are also eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare. They may be able to enroll in a Dual Eligible Special Needs Plan, a type of managed care plan that helps to coordinate coverage for those with complex medical needs.Work With a ProfessionalSSDI, SSI, Medicare, and Medicaid all have complex rules that may vary by state. Whether youre turning 65 or reaching retirement age, contact Ashley Day at 251-277-3377. She can provide answers and assist with any necessary paperwork.